Allowed¶17

Manik Kumar Singh @ Manik Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Aug 2025CR. MISC./27751/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail order, Patna High Court, CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27751 of 2025, Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra, 04-08-2025; Jay Nagar G.R.P. P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 (Rail Jaynagar, Samastipur); offences under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) read with Section 27 Arms Act; petitioner Manik Kumar Singh @ Manik Singh; not named in FIR; CCTV identification; charge-sheet submitted; custody since 30.11.2024; three antecedents on bail; bail bonds Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jay Nagar G.R.P. P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024. ¶17

Manik Kumar Singh @ Manik Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27751 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- Rail Jaynagar District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Manik Kumar Singh @ Manik Singh S/o Vijay Singh R/o Village- Shelra ward no.12, P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani, Bihar

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhav Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 04-08-2025

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

¶10

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jay Nagar G.R.P. P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶11

The prosecution case, in short, is that the informant saw four unknown miscreants were assaulting his son and when the informant tried to intervene, the miscreants attacked him with a pistol butt, robbed his bag and fled away from the place of occurrence leaving them injured.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27751 of 2025(3) dt.04-08-2025 2/2

¶14

incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The petitioner has been identified through CCTV footage. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation of assault levelled against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2024 and has got three criminal antecedents in which he is on bail.

¶15

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶17

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jay Nagar G.R.P. P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024.

¶18

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶19

Rajorshi/-

¶20

U T

Manik Kumar Singh @ Manik Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manik Kumar Singh @ Manik Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taj Pratap Kumar @ Tej Pratap Kumar @ Pratap Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pravin Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Satyanand Panigrahi Vs The State of Bihar

Banti Kumar @ Banti Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Prakash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Sahni @ Khatikwan Vs The State of Bihar