Allowed

Salu Kumar Yadav @ Kumar Shanu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Feb 2025CR. MISC./2771/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh granted bail to the petitioner who apprehended arrest in a case under Sections 76 and 126(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for outraging modesty, allowing surrender within eight weeks on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount if arrest/surrender made within eight weeks.

Salu Kumar Yadav @ Kumar Shanu Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2771 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2024 Thana- KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Salu Kumar Yadav @ Kumar Shanu S/O Late Rajendra Yadav @ Rajendra Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Kadepura, P.S- Muffasil, Dist- Katihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

===================	=================	... ... Opposite Party/s ==================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr.Bhola Prasad
For the Opposite Party/s : ===================	Ms.Rita Verma =================	==================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 15-02-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 76, 126(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶14

It is alleged that this petitioner outraged the modesty of informant.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both parties are co-villagers and due to petty dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged. F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of 5 days without there being any plausible explanation of delay, and this itself creates doubt on the veracity of the prosecution case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail

¶17

petition.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2771 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/2

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Katihar in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 186 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

anay

¶22

U T

Salu Kumar Yadav @ Kumar Shanu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salu Kumar Yadav @ Kumar Shanu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Mahton Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Chotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhat Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Chauhan @ Bholu @ Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Rai Vs The State of Bihar