Allowed

Sri Ram Patel @ Ram Kumar Mahto @ Shri Ram Patel v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 May 2025CR. MISC./27350/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna considered a bail application filed by Sri Ram Patel in connection with offenses under IPC and Arms Act. Considering the fact that co-accused were granted bail and other circumstances, the Court ordered the petitioners release on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Sri Ram Patel @ Ram Kumar Mahto @ Shri Ram Patel Vs The State… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27350 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2024 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sri Ram Patel @ Ram Kumar Mahto @ Shri Ram Patel S/o- Late Nagendra Patel @ Late Nagendra Mahto Resident of village- Chakmaruf PS- Vaishali Belsar OP District- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. II. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-05-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S Case No. 397 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the I.P.C and under Section 25(1-B) a, 26,35 of Arms Act.

¶14

As per prosecution case, one country made pistol with two live cartridge were recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that petitioner is innocent has committed no offence and have falsely been implicated in this case only mere on

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27350 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2

¶17

suspicion. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 15.06.2024.

¶18

However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶19

On perusal of the FIR and impugned order and materials on record, it appears that co-accused have been granted bail by the trial Court and petitioner is in judicial custody since 15.06.2024.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S Case No. 397 of 2024.

¶21

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶22

Mayank/-

¶23

U T

Sri Ram Patel @ Ram Kumar Mahto @ Shri Ram Patel v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Ram Patel @ Ram Kumar Mahto @ Shri Ram Patel v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Kumar @ Guddu Rangeela @ Rangila Vs The State of Bihar

Vikram Vishwas Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Prabha Sinha

Baby Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Brijbhan Sah Vs the State of Bihar