Allowed¶20

Madhu Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jan 2025CR. MISC./2618/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court bail order; Criminal Miscellaneous (CR. MISC.) No.2618 of 2025; decided 27-01-2025; Rudra Prakash Mishra, J; petitioner Madhu Ram; Jairampur PS Case No. 88 of 2024, District Sheikhpura; Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; 15 litres country made liquor recovered from motorcycle; custody since 12.11.2024; three criminal antecedents; charge-sheet submitted; non-compliance of Section 103 B.N.S.S. alleged; bail granted on Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties of like amount.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court, in connection with Jairampur PS Case No. 88 of 2024. ¶20

Madhu Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2618 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2024 Thana- JAYRAMPUR District- Sheikhpura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Madhu Ram S/O Late Shiv Narayan Ram R/O Village- Chhoti Malawan, P.SSarmera, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Pd, (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 27-01-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jairampur PS Case No. 88 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 15 litres of country made liquor was recovered from motorcycle.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of the vehicle in question. The petitioner is in custody since

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2618 of 2025(2) dt.27-01-2025 2/2

¶17

12.11.2024 and has got three criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jairampur PS Case No. 88 of 2024.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶22

Raj Ranjan/- U T

Madhu Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Habib Khan Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakhindra Paswan @ Lakhindar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Mister Turi @ Mayank Kumar @ Mayank Turi Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Kumar Yadav @ Vinod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sushila Devi Vs The State of Bihar