Sanjay Ram Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25422 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2024 Thana- BISHANPUR District- Darbhanga

====================================================== Sanjay Ram S/o Suresh Ram R/o vill - Gudhaila, P.S.- Bishanpur, Distt.Darbhanga

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶6

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶8

4 29-07-2025 Heard the parties.

¶9

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bishanpur Chowk P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the I.P.C. and 25(1-B)(a)/ 26/ 35 of Arms Act.

¶10

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and remains in custody since 18.12.2024.

¶11

The allegation against the petitioner is to commit robbery along with other co-accused persons and while committing so, looted cash of Rs. 5 lakh which was in possession of the informant, being operator of CSP, SBI. .

¶12

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25422 of 2025(4) dt.29-07-2025 2/3

¶14

petitioner submitted that the name of petitioner transpired on the basis of suspicion arising out of video clips. It is submitted that several accused persons granted bail by different learned co-ordinate Benches of this Court through, Annexures P/3 and P/4 series i.e., Cr. Misc. No. 54261 of 2024 vide order dated 13.09.2024 and Cr. Misc. No. 73142 of 2024 vide order dated 18.12.2024. It is pointed out that considering judicial parity, petitioner also deserves bail. It is further pointed out that recovered Rs. 62,000/- belongs to this petitioner which was out of his personal savings and was kept for purchasing three wheeler and moreover, recovered currency note cannot be connected prima-facie with looted currency in want of details and denomination. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case, where is in on bail and moreover, investigation of this case is completed, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶15

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

¶16

In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

¶17

taking note of fact as save and except suspicion arising out of

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25422 of 2025(4) dt.29-07-2025 3/3

¶19

video clips nothing appears incriminating prima-facie against this petitioner, where even recovered currency note not appears connected with looted currency prima-facie in want of details and denomination, coupled with fact that petitioner remains in custody since 18.12.2024, accordingly petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bishanpur Chowk P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM X, Darbhanga /concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 480(3) of BNSS.

¶20

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶21

Sudha/- U T

Sanjay Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pardeshi Ram @ Pardeshi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar @ Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Irshad Hussain @ Irshad Hussain Vs The State of Bihar