Allowed¶21

Sunil Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Feb 2025CR. MISC./2467/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court oral order dated 20-02-2025 by Justice Chandra Prakash Singh allowing regular bail application of Ram Bali Chaudhary @ Rambali Chaudhary in CR. MISC. No.2705 of 2025 (Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 401 of 2024, District Samastipur) under Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; 25 litres illicit country liquor recovery; custody since 24.11.2024; two criminal antecedents; bail-bond Rs.20,000/- with two like sureties; State represented by A.P.P.; counsel Khushi Awadh for petitioner, Anand Kishore Choudhary for opposite party.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be enlarged on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Samastipur, in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 401 of 2024. ¶21

Sunil Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2705 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2024 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Bali Chaudhary @ Rambali Chaudhary Son of Late Baldeo Chaudhary Resident of Village- Bajidpur Bambaiya, Ward No.- 14, PS- Bibhutipur, Distt.- Samastipur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Khushi Awadh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-02-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P for the State.

¶14

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 401 of 2024 dated 23.11.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 25 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

¶16

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2705 of 2025(2) dt.20-02-2025 2/2

¶18

possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 24.11.2024.

¶19

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶20

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Samastipur in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 401 of 2024.

¶21

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶23

guddukr/-

¶24

U T

Sunil Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arunjay Shikari @ Runjay Shikari Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Pinku Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Durgesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Tarkeshwar Singh Vs The State of Bihar