Dismissed¶9

Sattan Kumar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Apr 2025CR. MISC./2424/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court bail rejection; Sattan Kumar Mandal s/o Bateshwar Mandal; Banka P.S. Case No. 196 of 2024; Section 394 IPC; informant Chandan Singh; FIR 07.05.2024; loot of Rs. 87,560/- at revolver butt; judicial custody since 18.06.2024; confessional-statement claim of no role; CCTV identification of petitioner by his father per case diary; accused in five criminal cases (criminal antecedents); counsel Sudhir Kumar Mishra; APP Anand Kishore Choudhary; Honourable Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy; oral order dated 19-04-2025; bail application stands rejected.

What did the court decide?

Considering the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and the petitioner's criminal antecedents, no relief (bail) could be granted to the petitioner. ¶8

Sattan Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2424 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2024 Thana- BANKA District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sattan Kumar Mandal Son of Bateshwar Mandal Resident of Village- Vijay Nagar, P.S.- Banka, District- Banka

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar, Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sudhir Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 19-04-2025 Heard the parties.

¶12

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection

¶13

with Banka P.S. Case No. 196 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 07.05.2024 by the informant, Chandan Singh.

¶14

As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that after collecting Rs. 87,560/- when he came out, the accused persons riding on a motorcycle after injuring his head by butt of country made revolver looted the said amount. This led to the FIR.

¶15

The investigation took and the name of the petitioner cropped up.

¶16

Para-3 of the petition shows that he has criminal antecedent of the same nature inasmuch as he has been made

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2424 of 2025(4) dt.19-04-2025 2/2

¶18

accused in five criminal cases.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his name has come in the confessional statement, has no role to play and is in custody since 18.06.2024.

¶20

Learned APP on the other hand opposes the prayer stating with the help of the case diary that the petitioner’s father himself upon watching CCTV identified him as the person who was involved in the crime.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and the submissions of the parties as also the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, no relief can be granted.

¶22

The bail application stands rejected.

¶23

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶24

Ravi/-

¶25

U T

Sattan Kumar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sattan Kumar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Buddhan Nadaf @ Budhan Nadaf @ Md. Budhan Vs The State of Bihar

Sitaram Ram @ Shri Sitaram Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Nand Kishore Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Bhanu Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Ray Vs The State of Bihar