Dismissed¶30

Alok Sahni @ Alakh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jul 2025CR. MISC./23665/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail rejected; Sections 395 and 412 IPC; loot/dacoity case; Medni Chowki P.S. Case No. 69 of 2012, District Lakhisarai; petitioners not named in FIR; named in co-accused's confessional statement (Vivek Kumar); no recovery; no TIP; anticipatory bail rejected 2013; absconded over 12 years; custody since 08.01.2025; charge sheet filed; Patna High Court Cr. Misc. Nos. 21728 and 23665 of 2025; order dated 17-07-2025.

What did the court decide?

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and in particular that the petitioners absconded for more than twelve years after rejection of their bail application, this Court was not inclined to grant bail and rejected the applications. ¶29

Alok Sahni @ Alakh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21728 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2012 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai

¶3

====================================================== Anil ram S/o Vishnudev Ram Resident of Village- Mustafapur, P.S.Manikpur, District-Lakhisarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

======================================================

¶9

with

¶10

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23665 of 2025

¶11

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2012 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai

¶12

====================================================== Alok Sahni @ Alakh Kumar Son of Triveni Sahni Resident of Village - Mustafapur, Khar Toli, P.S. - Sureyagadha, District - Lakhisarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21728 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Md. Irshad, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23665 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶18

3 17-07-2025

¶19

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶20

A.P.P for the State.

¶21

2 . The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Medni Chowki P.S. Case No. 69 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable u/s 395 and 412 of the I.P.C.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21728 of 2025(3) dt.17-07-2025 2/3

¶23

3 . As per the prosecution case, some unknown miscreants are alleged to have committed loot in the house of the informant and took away cash of Rs. 15,000/- and some costly utensils, clothes and mobile phones.

¶24

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are not named in the FIR and their names have surfaced in the confessional statement of the co-accused Vivek Kumar. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners and till date no TIP has been conducted. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner Anil Ram has one criminal antecedent whereas the petitioner Alok Sahni has clean antecedent and both are in custody since 08.01.2025.

¶25

5 . Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is an allegation against the petitioners of committing theft in the house of the informant and the petitioner, namely, Anil Ram has one criminal antecedent of similar nature of offence. It is further stated that the present case is of the year 2012 and the charge sheet has been submitted against some accused persons u/s 395/412 of the I.P.C. and the case has also been found true against both the petitioners. The learned APP points out that the petitioners had

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21728 of 2025(3) dt.17-07-2025 3/3

¶27

preferred Anticipatory bail application in 2013 and after the rejection of their bail application both the petitioners did not surrender rather absconded for next more than 12 years and as such they should not be released on bail.

¶28

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

¶29

of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioners absconded for more than twelve years after rejection of their bail application, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners and the same is hereby rejected.

¶30

7. Accordingly, the applications stand rejected.

¶31

(Sourendra Pandey, J)

¶32

Jyoti/-

¶33

U T

Alok Sahni @ Alakh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alok Sahni @ Alakh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nagdiya Ram @ Mukesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Shesh Kumar @ Sheshnath Kumar @ Sheshnath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Anil ram Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Harun Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar