This court granted permission to the petitioner/s to withdraw their anticipatory bail application, which was consequently dismissed as withdrawn. No legal principles were discussed.
Permission accorded to withdraw the anticipatory bail application; application dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22790 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2021 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing
vehemently for some time realising his difficulty, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
SUMIT/-
U T
Md. Mumtaz @ Md. Mamtaz, Md. Isteyak @ Md. Istiyak
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
