Mishrilal Rai Vs the State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22344 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-656 Year-2024 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran

======================================================

Mishrilal Rai Son of Rajman Rai Resident of Village - Panchrukha Ward No. 13, P.S. - Banjariya, District - East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhannjay Kumar II, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 01-05-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶12

Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Muffasil Motihari P.S.Case No.656 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5) of BNSS, 2023.

¶13

As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner was found involved in illegal sale of stolen diesel and total 600 ltr. of diesel was recovered from the house of the petitioner. The present FIR has been lodged against the petitioner at the instance of the local Chowkidar.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a farmer and for the agricultural purpose, he has purchased 600 ltrs. diesel from Jay

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22344 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/3

¶16

Ambe Kisan Dewa Kendra, East Champaran after making payment of total Rs.56,232/-, as such, the storage can not be said to be illegal in any manner. The petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶17

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the nature of allegation made in the FIR, as well as, the fact that the petitioner has been able to bring on record, the purchase receipt of the diesel dated 29.12.2024 and the alleged seizure was conducted on 31.12.2024 and the FIR was lodged on the same day.

¶19

I view of the above fact, I find that the petitioner has prima facie made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

¶20

The the petitioner is directed to be released on prearrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned district court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran/concerned court, in connection with Muffasil Motihari P.S.Case No.656 of 2024, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS of 2023.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22344 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 3/3

¶22

At the time of furnishing the bail bond, the petitioner will furnish certified copy of Khatians relating to the land, which are being owned by the petitioner and his other family members.

¶23

The learned district court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

¶24

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶25

chn/-

¶26

U T

Mishrilal Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mishrilal Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birbal Rai @ Birbal Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Bulet Ravidas Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Rakesh Vs The State of Bihar

Sudha Trivedy Vs The State of Bihar

Prahalad Sahani @ Prahalad Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Reeta Devi @ Rekha Devi Vs The State of Bihar