Allowed¶20

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Apr 2025CR. MISC./22254/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court bail order dated 09-04-2025 by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra in Cr. Misc. No.22254 of 2025 arising from Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025 (District Patna) under Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; 50 litres illicit country liquor recovered from Scooty; plea of non-compliance of Section 103 BNSS; custody since 02.02.2025; no criminal antecedent; bail granted on Rs.10,000 bonds with two like sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025. ¶20

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22254 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2025 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rohit Kumar S/o- Jalil Nat R/o- North Mandir PS- Budha Colony Dist- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Arya, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 09-04-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 50 liters of illicit country-made liquor from the Scooty. The petitioner was arrested on the spot.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not the owner of the seized Scooty. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22254 of 2025(2) dt.09-04-2025 2/2

¶18

concern with the seized liquor. There is a non-compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 02.02.2025 without any rhymes or reason.

¶19

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶22

rishi/-

¶23

U T

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chhotan Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Kishore Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Kumar Dubey Vs The State of Bihar