Ravi Kumar Dubey @ Rabi Dube Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22105 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2024 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran

======================================================

Ravi Kumar Dubey @ Rabi Dube, aged about 28 years (M), Son of Shreekant Dubey, resident of village Virta Tola, P.S. Nakardeyi, Dist. East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. Mr. Hemant Ray, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 05-08-2025

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 504 of 2024 (N.D.P.S. G.R. Case No. 100 of 2024) instituted for the offences under Section 111 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

¶12

As per prosecution case, the police, on receipt of secret information, chased a truck bearing Regd. No. BR06GF7353 and, on search, total 43 bundles of Ganja, total weighing 361.2 Kg was recovered from the same. It is further alleged that on the disclosures made by the driver of the said truck, the police also chased a Scorpio bearing Regd. No. BR05PB-5419 and, on search, 02 bundles of Ganja, total weighing 16.08 Kg.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22105 of 2025(4) dt.05-08-2025 2/3

¶14

was also recovered. Accordingly, two separate seizure lists were prepared. It is alleged that the petitioner is the driver of the alleged Scorpio.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2024 and has no criminal antecedent. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is the driver of the Scorpio and had no knowledge about the alleged Ganja being kept under the seat of the alleged Scorpio. The petitioner is not the owner of the alleged Scorpio rather was hired by the co-accused Ashok Sah as a driver. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the quantity of the alleged Ganja recovered from the alleged Scorpio is below commercial quantity, and hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22105 of 2025(4) dt.05-08-2025 3/3

¶19

of the case, clean antecedent, the quantity of Ganja recovered from the alleged Scorpio being below the commercial quantity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 504 of 2024 (N.D.P.S. G.R. Case No. 100 of 2024), subject to the following conditions;

¶21

(i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

¶22

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

¶23

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶24

rishi/-

¶25

U T

Ravi Kumar Dubey @ Rabi Dube v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar Dubey @ Rabi Dube v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banti Kumar @ Banti Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Prakash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Sahni @ Khatikwan Vs The State of Bihar

Tuntun Yadav @ Tuntun Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bimlesh Kumar @ Bimlesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kajim Ansari @ Md. Kajim @ Md. Kajim Ansari Vs The State of Bihar