In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed for bail in a murder case, the High Court rejected the petition, citing the gravity of the offence and specific allegations of murder and disposal of the body in the FIR.
Prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21846 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2022 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj
======================================================
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
State.
the offence punishable under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21846 of 2024(5) dt.17-01-2025 2/2
clearly indicates that the death occurred at least four to seven days prior to the postmortem examination. Thus, as per the postmortem report, death must have occurred between 29.05.2022 to 01.06.2022 and not on 04.06.2022. Thus if the post mortem report is believed, the whole prosecution case is falsified.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shashi
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Raj Kumar Mahato
Bacha Sah
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
