Bhogendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-01-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Narahiya P.S. Case No. 24 of 2024, registered on 11.05.2024, giving rise to G.R. No. 654 of 2024 for the alleged offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per prosecution case, a pick-up vehicle of the informant loaded with pigs worth of Rs. 2,40,000/- was looted by unknown miscreants at gunpoint. The robbers took away the mobile phones of informant and other persons who were with him on the pick-up van. The name of the petitioner transpired during investigation for being involved in the alleged robbery.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2139 of 2025(2) dt.17-01-2025 2/3

¶18

confessional statement of co-accused Shiv Narayan Kumar @ Tirka. No occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the person/possession of the petitioner. The co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 54049 of 2024. The petitioner is in custody since 19.09.2024 and charge-sheet has been submitted. The petitioner is having clean antecedent.

¶19

Learned APP vehemently opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner along with submission of charge sheet and his clean antecedent, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Jhanjharpur, District-Madhubani in connection with Narahiya P.S. Case No. 24 of 2024, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. and the following conditions:

¶21

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2139 of 2025(2) dt.17-01-2025 3/3

¶23

the petitioner.

¶24

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶25

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶26

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶27

V.K.Pandey/-

¶28

U T

Bhogendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhogendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tanuj Vs Vikash Kumar

Dr. Birendra Prasad Saha Vs Mahakant Saha

Smt. Manisha and Anr. Vs Smt. Sarita Sahi

Madan Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Damyanti Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Sharma Vs Hari Gope and Ors.