Dablu Choudhary @ Jayant Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20648 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2024 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka

======================================================

Dablu Choudhary @ Jayant Choudhary son of Late Jay Prakash Choudhary @ Late Prakash Choudhary Resident Of Village -Rampur, Ps -Amarpur, DistBanka

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Kumar Ranjan son of Jai Prakash village- Dev, Ps- Dev, Dist- Aurangabad (Mines Development Officer, Banka)

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kr. Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 23-04-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶14

petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

¶15

on behalf of the State.

¶16

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and apprehended his arrest in connection with Amarpur P.S.

¶17

Case No. 135 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the IPC, Sections 11, 41, 56(2) of the Bihar Minerals Rules 2021 and Sections 4(1) and 21 of the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957.

¶18

The allegation against the petitioner is to be

¶19

involved in illegal mining of sand.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20648 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/3

¶21

Mr. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing

¶22

on behalf of the petitioner submitted that merely on the basis of suspicion petitioner was implicated with the present case, whereas from the facial perusal of FIR his implication appears out of unknown local inputs. It is submitted that save and except suspicion nothing survives against this petitioner. While concluding the argument it is submitted that petitioner found involved in two more cases of different nature, where he is on bail and moreover, similarly situated co-accused namely Gautam Kumar Choudhary has already granted anticipatory bail by learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court through Cr. Misc. No. 70893 of 2024 vide order dated 11.12.2024.

¶23

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶24

In view of the facts and circumstances and by taking note of the fact as prima-facie except suspicion nothing survives against this petitioner, where one of the similarly situated co-accused person has already granted anticipatory bail as aforesaid, accordingly the petitioner above named, in

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20648 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 3/3

¶26

the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka/concerned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶27

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

¶28

S.Tripathi/-

¶29

U T

Dablu Choudhary @ Jayant Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dablu Choudhary @ Jayant Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Masoom Khan @ Sabih Ahmad @ Sabih Ahmad Khan Vs the State of Bihar

Mrs. Garima Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Himalya Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Taufique @ Taufik Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Anita Devi Vs The State of Bihar