Allowed¶18

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jul 2025CR. MISC./20451/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 20451 of 2025, decided 10-07-2025 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra (oral order). Bail application of Suraj Kumar in Barahiya P.S. Case No. 293 of 2024 (Lakhisarai) under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) BNS 2023; victim's Section 183 BNSS 2023 statement referred to by defence; bail granted with Rs. 10,000/- bonds and two sureties. Advocates: Rabi Bhushan (petitioner), Dilip Kumar No. 1 (State APP), Mukul Jee (informant).

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 293 of 2024, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court. ¶18

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20451 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2024 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Suraj Kumar S/o Simindra Singh @ Shivendra Singh R/o Village- Khushhal Tola, Ward No 20, PS- Barahiya, Distt.- Lakhisarai

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP for the Informant : Mr. Mukul Jee, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 10-07-2025

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State, learned counsel for the informant and perused the case diary.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 293 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶12

The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with other co-accused person enticed away informant’s minor daughter with wrongful intention.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20451 of 2025(4) dt.10-07-2025 2/3

¶15

present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that there is delay of ten days in lodging of the FIR. The petitioner has not kidnapped daughter of the informant, but the fact is that the victim girl herself eloped with the petitioner. It is next submitted that the victim is major. It is further submitted that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has stated nothing against the petitioner and has accepted that she eloped with the petitioner on her own will. The petitioner is in custody since 30.12.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20451 of 2025(4) dt.10-07-2025 3/3

¶20

below/concerned Court in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case

¶21

No. 293 of 2024.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Rajorshi/- U T

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mithu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kr. Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Yadav @ Budhan Yadav @ Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sahjan @ Sahajan @ Shahjan @ Sahajn Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kawadi Chiranjeevi @ Kawadi Siranjeevi @ Kawadi Chiranjeev @ Kawadi Siranjeev Vs The State of Bihar