Allowed¶24

Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Jha @ Naveen Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Apr 2025CR. MISC./20312/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration application; revision dismissed for default; statutory period of limitation; Criminal Revision No. 135 of 2024; PS Case No. 63 of 2017; Darbhanga Complaint Case; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No. 20312 of 2025; decided 11-04-2025; Bibek Chaudhuri, J; restoration allowed.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of Criminal Revision No. 135 of 2024 to the file of the Patna High Court. ¶24

Why is it important?

Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Jha @ Naveen Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20312 of 2025

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL REVISION No.135 of 2024

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2017 Thana- DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE District- Darbhanga

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Jha @ Naveen Jha S/o Pashupati Jha Resident of village- Chaugma, PO- Bahera, P.S.- Bahera, Distt.- Darbhanga, At present House no. 3142, Gali No. 10, Bhatta colony, sehatpur, Near Section 91, Faridabad (Harayana)

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Smt. Gayatri Devi W/o Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Jha @ Naveen Jha, D/o Prabhakar Jha R/o vill - Chaugma, P.S.- Bahera, Distt.- Darbhanga, at present of Vill - Ughara, P.S.- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Darbhanga

¶11

Suman Kumari D/o Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Jha @ Naveen Jha R/o vill - Chaugma, P.S.- Bahera, Distt.- Darbhanga, at present of Vill - Ughara, P.S.Bahadurpur, Distt.- Darbhanga

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER

¶17

3 11-04-2025

¶18

This is an application for restoration of Criminal Revision No. 135 of 2024. The application is taken up for hearing in presence of the learned Advocate for the petitioner.

¶19

It is found from the record that the revisional application was dismissed for default on 17^th January, 2025 and the petitioner filed an application for restoration on 17^th February, 2025. Though, it was brought on record on 25^th March, 2025.

¶20