Bail petition arising from a Barh police-station FIR dismissed by the High Court for non-prosecution when neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared, despite the presence of the State's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17883 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-743 Year-2024 Thana- BARH District- Patna
======================================================
Sanjay Mallah @ Sanjay Mahto Son of Late Katari Mahto @ Rajendra Mahto Village -Bind toli, Purani Barh PS -Barh Dist -Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 21-04-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However,
learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Jyoti Kumari/-
U
Sanjay Mallah @ Sanjay Mahto
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
