Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17766 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya

======================================================

Rohit Kumar S/O Late Shashibhusan Prasad R/O Gangamahal, Tutwari, Gaya, Police station- Kotwali, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Madhuri Lata, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶8

6 19-09-2025

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶10

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

¶12

Kotwali P.S. Case No.21 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶13

The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and is in custody since 17.01.2025.

¶14

During the police raid, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons were found unloading cough syrup, where one of the composition was “codeine phosphate”, which is a prohibited drug as per Narcotic Drugs and Psychtropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short ‘N.D.P.S. Act’).

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the drug in issue was

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17766 of 2025(6) dt.19-09-2025 2/3

¶17

of S.R. Traders and, therefore, for release of same the proprietor of firm namely, Shree Ram Kumar filed C.W.J.C. No.11353 of 2025 before Division Bench of this Court. It is submitted that as petitioner was engaged for unloading the same, he was implicated with present case, having otherwise no idea about the drugs which was sealed in cartoons or any composition of the drug as alleged through FIR being one of the narcotic substance. It is pointed out that the scheduled drugs can be stored as per license of the petitioner of aforesaid C.W.J.C. being ‘Schedule-H’ drug in his godown for the purpose of sale. While concluding argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is already completed for which, charge-sheet has been submitted and, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence and moreover petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.

¶18

Learned APP opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

In view of aforesaid factual submissions, as recovered drugs prima facie claimed by authorized dealer, as discussed aforesaid, coupled with the fact that the investigation of this case is already completed, where petitioner remains in custody since

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17766 of 2025(6) dt.19-09-2025 3/3

¶21

17.01.2025, accordingly, petitioner above-named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise, Court No. 4, Gaya/concerned court in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.21 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of the CrPC/under Section 480(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (for short ‘BNSS’).

¶22

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶23

veena/-

¶24

U T

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Israt Parween @ Israt Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Myank Pandey @ Mayank Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Punj Kumar Singh Vs The Union of India through the Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate

Pappu Sharma @ Amitabh Ranjan @ Amitav Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Harendra Ray Vs The State of Bihar