Abhishek Jha Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

7 16-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

¶13

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 305 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

3. Prosecution case in a nutshell is that daughter of the informant has been done to death at her matrimonial house by her in-laws due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

¶15

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 10-10-2023. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

¶16

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17551 of 2024(7) dt.16-01-2025 2/3

¶18

counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is the husband of the victim. Learned counsel next submits that there is no specific allegation attributed to the petitioner rather allegation is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that other co-accused have been granted bail by the court below itself. Learned counsel submits that marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the deceased in the year 2022 and since then, she had not made any complaint regarding cruelty against her. It is submitted that from perusal of the postmortem report, it would reveal that death was caused due to asphyxia caused by throttling. Learned counsel for the petitioner lastly submits that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.

¶19

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Witnesses have supported the prosecution case, which fact finds mention at paragraph No. 8 of the case diary.

¶20

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and there being no cogent material against the petitioner, even in the case diary as also charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17551 of 2024(7) dt.16-01-2025 3/3

¶22

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed , on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 305 of 2023, subject to the following conditions:

¶23

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

¶24

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶25

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Abhishek Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Belmanti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Altaf Vs The State of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar @ Khesari Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Sujeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ritesh Kumar @ Nitish Ray Vs The State Of Bihar