Disposed

Md. Jakir v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Apr 2025CR. MISC./17003/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pre-arrest bail sought in a Bariyarpur PS case involving allegations of sexual relationship on pretext of marriage followed by refusal to marry, registered under IPC sections including 376. Citing Supreme Court precedent that a broken relationship alone cannot ground an FIR for rape, the High Court granted anticipatory bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on pre-arrest bail on arrest/surrender within four weeks, on Rs.25,000 bail bond with two like sureties, subject to BNSS s.482(2) conditions.

Md. Jakir Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17003 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2024 Thana- Bariyarpur District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Jakir Son of Md. Shamsher, Resident of Village - Ganj Gaurihar, P.S. - Sakra (Bariyarpur), District - Muzaffarpur (Bihar)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Muskan Khatoon Daughter of Shahabuddin, Resident of Village - Ganj Gaurihar, P.S. - Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur (Bihar)

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 16-04-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶13

petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶14

Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Bariyarpur P.S.Case No.35/24 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 376, 504 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code .

¶15

As per the allegation made in the complaint petition, the complainant is victim of illicit relationship with the petitioner, who on the pretext of marriage, established sexual relationship with her and, thereafter, refused to solemnize marry with her.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17003 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 2/3

¶18

petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a married man and he has denied the factum of any relationship with the victim and in support, he has brought on record the affidavit filed by his wife, namely, Sanaj Khatoon in Complaint Case No.748 of 2024. The said case has been filed against Md. Sahabuddin, who is the father of the complainant, namely, Muskan Khatoon. The complainant has alleged that she was having relationship with the petitioner for the last six months and upon refusal to marry, she has filed the present complaint petition. She has admitted that sexual act was established between the parties.

¶19

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶20

In the case of Naim Ahmed Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) , reported in 2023 SCC Online SC 89 and in the case of Sonu @ Subash Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., reported in 2021 AIR SC 140, the Apex Court has observed that “the complainant was very much capable of understanding the consequences of her action and if the relationship is not working out, the same cannot be ground for lodging an F.I.R for the offence under Section 376 of I.P.C ”

¶21

In the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17003 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 3/3

¶23

event of his arrest or surrender before the learned district court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM VIII (East) Muzaffarpur/concerned court, in connection with Bariyarpur P.S.Case No.35/24 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS of 2023

¶24

The learned district court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

¶25

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶26

chn/-

¶27

U T

Md. Jakir v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Jakir v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prof. Dr. Jaishankar Jha Vs The Vice Chancellor

Babita Davi, Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Kumar Singh Vs The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board

Bilash Yadav @ Ram Bilash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rizwan Alam @ Toni Vs The State Of Bihar