Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16719 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2024 Thana- Banshi District- Arwal

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kundan Kumar S/O Sudhir Kumar Pandit Resident of Village - Sidhrampur, P.S- Bansi, Dist- Arwal

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajit Ranjan Kumar, Adv. Mr.Harendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey, APP For the Informant/s : Ms.Priya Ranjan, Adv. Ms.Chandani Kumari, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 30-10-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 38 of 2024 dated 19.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 304B, 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

3 . As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the informant’s sister mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 5,00,000/- as dowry. On 18.03.2024 at about 12,00 hours, the informant got information that the accused persons have committed murder of his sister by administering some

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16719 of 2025(3) dt.30-10-2025 2/3

¶16

poisonous substance and the co-accused Ajay Kumar Sao being a quack doctor is also involved in the conspiracy to commit the said offence.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the informant’s sister. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and he has no concern with the alleged offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 20.11.2024. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 25.06.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42535 of 2024.

¶18

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶19

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Arwal in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 38 of

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16719 of 2025(3) dt.30-10-2025 3/3

¶21

¶22

7. The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

shivam/-

¶25

U T

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu @ Sumit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Guddan Kumar @ Guddan Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Sardar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar