Bail application arising from a Vigilance police case was sought to be withdrawn by the petitioner as having become infructuous; the High Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15713 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-444 Year-2021 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
======================================================
Swati Kumari (F) aged about 36 years, D/o- Ganesh Singh, R/o village and P.O. Jarang Rampur, P.S. Vasiahli (Belsar OP), District Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Mishra, A.P.P. For the Vigilance : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 03-09-2025
Heard Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Ajay Mishra, learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the Vigilance.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-
U T
Swati Kumari
The State of Bihar
The Vigilance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
