Dismissed¶¶24

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh @ Chhote Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 May 2025CR. MISC./15245/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail rejected; Patna High Court CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15245 of 2025; Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh @ Chhote Singh v. The State of Bihar; Bikram P.S. Case No. 477 of 2023; Sections 341, 323, 307, 326, 34 IPC; assault lathi danda illegal arms head injury informant; SLP Cr. No. 14760 of 2024 dated 24.10.2024 Apex Court rejected anticipatory bail surrender four weeks 65 days; seven criminal antecedents; judicial custody since 25.01.2025; co-accused anticipatory bail Cr. Misc. No. 55606 of 2024 dated 10.01.2025; Ramesh Chand Malviya, J; order dated 15-05-2025.

What did the court decide?

On perusal of the FIR and the impugned order, the allegation against the petitioner is of assault by illegal arms upon the head of the informant and his hand, causing serious injury. ¶¶20

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh @ Chhote Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15245 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-477 Year-2023 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh @ Chhote Singh S/O Vijay Sharma @ Vijay Singh R/o Vill.- Moriyama P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gyan Abhinav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 15-05-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Bikram P.S Case No. 477 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 326, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per prosecution case, allegation against this petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members by means of lathi, danda causing injury to them.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is land dispute between both the parties.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15245 of 2025(4) dt.15-05-2025 2/3

¶18

Similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55606 of 2024. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.01.2025.

¶19

However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner bears seven criminal antecedents.

¶20

On perusal of the FIR and impugned order, it appears that the allegation against the present petitioner (Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh @ Chhote Singh is of assault by illegal arms upon the head of the informant and his hand causing serious injury. It also appears that three persons are injured, first Vinod Pandey, son of the informant Nandlal Pandey two injuries found, lacerated wound over frontal region and lacerated would over parietal region. Second Nandlal Pandey (informant) two injuries are found, first lacerated would over frontal region of head and tenderness all over the body, third injured Subodh Kumar, lacerated would over perital region and lacerated would over parietal region. It also appears from the order of Hon’ble Apex Court passed in SLP Cr. No. 14760 of 2024 dated 24.10.2024, Hon’ble Apex Court rejected

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15245 of 2025(4) dt.15-05-2025 3/3

¶22

the anticipatory bail of the petitioner and directed to surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks and application will be considered its own merit expeditiously but the petitioner has not surrendered within the stipulated period by the direction of Hon’ble Apex Court and petitioner has surrendered before the learned trial court after 65 days.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and violation of direction of Hon’ble Apex Court, criminal antecedents of seven cases as stated in Para 3 of the petition, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶24

Accordingly, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶25

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶26

Ranjeet/-

¶27

U T

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh @ Chhote Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh @ Chhote Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Munna @ Md. Munna Mansuri Vs The State of Bihar

Ritik Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Yadav @ Chutri Yadav @ Chhutri Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Kaunain @ Kausar Koten Vs The State of Bihar

Bisho Kumar @ Visho Kumar Vs The State of Bihar