Karan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13397 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1061 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- East Champaran

======================================================

Karan Kumar S/O Motilal Sah @ Motilal Mahato Resident of village- Ujjain Lohiyar, P.S- Harsidihi, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise PS Case No. 1061 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶13

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 54.450 liters foreign liquor was recovered from motorcycle and car.

¶14

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner was not arrested on the spot. Name of the petitioner has sprung in this case on confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Shajit Siddiki. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13397 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/3

¶16

petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the motorcycle and car in question. The petitioner is in custody since 09-12-2024 and has got six criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023. Other co-accused has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14-08-2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55065 of 2024. Charge sheet is submitted in this case.

¶17

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶19

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise PS Case No. 1061 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

¶20

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

¶21

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13397 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/3

¶23

fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶24

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶25

Raj Kishore/- U T

Karan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhananjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anshul Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Madhusudan Yadav @ Masudan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Thakur @ Anki @ Ainki Vs The State of Bihar

Ramji Saw Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Kumar Kapar @ Duliya Vs The State of Bihar