Allowed¶27

Firoj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Aug 2025CR. MISC./13102/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; PACS paddy embezzlement; CMR not deposited with SFC; Kharif 2023-24 procurement; Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 192 of 2024; East Champaran; IPC Sections 408, 409, 420, 34; BNSS Section 482(2); bail bond Rs. 25,000 with two sureties; six weeks to surrender; Ramvinay Kumar PACS Chairman; parity with Cr. Misc No. 2661 of 2025; Satyavrat Verma, J.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed for all seven petitioners in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 192 of 2024: release upon arrest or surrender within six weeks on bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to Section 482(2) BNSS conditions. ¶27

Firoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶27

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioners, who apprehend arrest in Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 192 of 2024 (offences under Sections 408, 409, 420 and 34 IPC arising from alleged paddy embezzlement by PACS), should be released on anticipatory bail.

¶26

Court's answer

Anticipatory bail granted to all seven petitioners: in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within six weeks, they are to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending, in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 192 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶27

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Satyavrat Verma, J.), CR. MISC. No.13102 of 2025, decided 18-08-2025: Anticipatory bail granted to seven petitioners — the PACS Manager (petitioner No. 1) and member-petitioners of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society at Kudarkat, East Champaran — who apprehended arrest in Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 192 of 2024 registered under Sections 408, 409, 420 and 34 IPC over alleged non-deposit of CMR and embezzlement of paddy purchased during Kharif 2023-24 (258.575 quintal valued at Rs. 56,44,692.25/- allegedly embezzled by PACS Chairman Ramvinay Kumar along with the Manager). Taking into account the submissions — including that the Chairman had already been granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc No. 2661 of 2025 (Coordinate Bench order dated 15-2-2025) on agreeing to pay Rs. 47,22,920.5/- in twelve instalments — the Court directed that, upon arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within six weeks, the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail on bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each with two like sureties, subject to the conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13102 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2024 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Firoj Kumar Son of Bhikhari Ray Resident of Village - Kudarkat, P.S. - Chhauradano, District - East Champaran

¶5

Jagdish Ram Son of Late Ramswarup Ram Resident of Village - Kudarkat, P.S. - Chhauradano, District - East Champaran

¶6

Harishankar Prasad Son of Dashrath Sah Resident of Village - Kudarkat, P.S. - Chhauradano, District - East Champaran

¶7

Vinod Ray Son of Hari Ray Resident of Village - Kudarkat, P.S. - Chhauradano, District - East Champaran

¶8

Chitranjan Kumar @ Chitranjan Prasad Son of Dinanath Prasad Resident of Village - Kudarkat, P.S. - Chhauradano, District - East Champaran

¶9

Anita Devi Wife of Madan Sah Resident of Village - Kudarkat, P.S. - Chhauradano, District - East Champaran

¶10

Rita Devi Wife of Vinod Ray Resident of Village - Kudarkat, P.S. - Chhauradano, District - East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Ray, Adv Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶15

6 18-08-2025

¶16

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners Shri

¶17

Hemant Ray, and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶18

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

¶19

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 408, 409, 420, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13102 of 2025(6) dt.18-08-2025 2/3

¶22

alleges that 4697 quintal of paddy was purchased during Kharif year 2023-24 by PACS, out of which 174 MT CMR was provided to SFC, it is next alleged that 145 MT CMR has not been deposited with the SFC by the PACS of which Ramvinay Kumar is a Chairman. It is also alleged that during physical verification of the godown, it transpired that Ramvinay Kumar along with Manager of PACS have embezzled the paddy to the tune of 258.575 quintal equivalent to a sum of Rs. 56,44,692.25/-.

¶23

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 is the PACS Manager and rest of the petitioners are members of the PACS. It is further submitted that Ramvinay Kumar, Chairman of the PACS, had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 2661 of 2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 15-2-2025, (Annexure-3 to the supplementary affidavit) passed by a learned Coordinate Bench. It is further submitted that privilege of anticipatory bail was granted to Ramvinay Kumar as he was ready to pay all the legitimate dues but in installment. It is submitted that Ramvinay Kumar agreed to make payment of Rs. 47,22,920.5/- in 12 installments, i.e., price of paddy equivalent to 2163.5 qunital. It is also submitted that it was also

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13102 of 2025(6) dt.18-08-2025 3/3

¶25

agreed by the Chairman of the PACS that if any further amount is found payable, in that event, the same shall also be paid by him. It is next submitted that since Ramvinay Kumar accepted the onus of making the payment that in itself demonstrates that petitioners have been implicated in a mechanical manner.

¶26

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶27

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 192 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

¶28

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶29

Sumit/-

Firoj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Firoj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivam Kumar Bhaiya @ Shivam Bhaiya Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra kumar @ Jitendra Ray @ Jitendra Rfay Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Ray @ Mithlesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Kumar Yadav @ Raju @ Pradip Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Rai @ Rakesh Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Murat Ray Vs The State of Bihar