Munni Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 600 of 2024, F.I.R dated 23.09.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶17

Recovery is of 4 liters of country made liquor.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶19

the petitioner has clean antecedent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R is false and fabricated. He further submits that the it appears from the F.I.R that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11022 of 2025(3) dt.05-05-2025 2/4

¶21

petitioner rather the recovery has been made from the motorcycle in question and she has been made accused merely on the ground that she is the owner of the motorcycle in question.

¶22

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner referring the provision contained in Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and submitted that the pre-arrest bail would not be maintainable.

¶23

This court is aware of the decision of the Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 . Having regard to the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment and the submission advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court, for the limited purpose of grant of anticipatory bail, is inclined to accept the submission of counsel for the petitioner.

¶24

Considering the aforesaid facts, nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, the petitioner has clean antecedent and the petitioner has been made accused merely on the basis of that she is the owner of the motorcycle in qeustion, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11022 of 2025(3) dt.05-05-2025 3/4

¶26

period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1^st Exclusive Special Excise Court, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 600 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:-

¶27

i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶28

ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶29

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed her criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

¶30

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11022 of 2025(3) dt.05-05-2025 4/4

¶31

acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶32

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶33

Jyoti Kumari/-

¶34

U T

Munni Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munni Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aniket Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Singh @ Arbind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Mandal @ Dubba Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar @ Roushan Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Poddar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeev Rajak Vs The State of Bihar