Munna Ram Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10491 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2024 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Munna Ram S/O Late Khaderan Ram R/O Village- Ismailpur, P.S- Buxar Muffasil, District- Buxar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyapal Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buxar Muffasil PS Case No. 436 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶13

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 1.5 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from motorcycle.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10491 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/3

¶16

of liquor. It is submitted that motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR-44E-4401 in question does not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 13.12.2024 and has got eleven criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S. Other co-accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 04.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4524 of 2025.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Buxar Muffasil PS Case No. 436 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10491 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 3/3

¶21

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

¶22

the family of the petitioner.

¶23

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶24

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶25

Raj Ranjan/- U T

Munna Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jawed Farukhi @ Jawed Faruki Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pinku Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar