Allowed

Rakesh Ranjan @ Rocky v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jul 2025CR. MISC./10279/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in a CBI case arising from the NEET-2024 examination paper leak. The petitioner, alleged to have organised arrangements at Patna where candidates memorised solved papers, was in custody since July 2024 and charge-sheeted. Considering the facts, circumstances and period of custody, the court allowed bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two like sureties, subject to stated conditions including surrender of passport and attendance on each date.

Rakesh Ranjan @ Rocky Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10279 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2024 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rakesh Ranjan @ Rocky Son of Late Suresh Chaudhary Resident of Village - Ganjendra Bigha, P.S. - Hilsa, District - Nalanda

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Central Bureau of Investigation, CGO Complex, New Delhi New Delhi

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP For the CBI : Mr. Ajay Mishra, Sr. C.G.C. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

11 04-07-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP

¶15

for the State and learned counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation.

¶16

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Shastri Nagar P.S. Case No. 358 of 2024 dated 23.06.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 407, 408, 409 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, the case was taken over by the C.B.I. and re-registered as RC No. 22122024E0006-CBI/EO-III/, New Delhi on 23.06.2024.

¶17

3. As per the prosecution case, on 05.05.2024, during patrolling, the informant got information from his senior

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10279 of 2025(11) dt.04-07-2025 2/6

¶19

officials that in the NEET Examination, 2024, an organized gang, some students and some examination conducting staffs, in collusion with one another has destroyed the integrity and sanctity of the chain of custody of the question papers and leaked the question papers. He was also informed that some members of the organized gang were moving in a white colour Renault Duster Car around the examination centre. For the verification of the same, on checking, when he intercepted the white Duster Car bearing Registration No. JH01BW0019, and three people who were trying to escape, were caught on the spot who told their names as 1. Sikandar Yadvendu, 2. Akhilesh Kumar and 3. Bittu Kumar. On searching the car, four xerox copies of Admit Cards of four candidates, namely, Abhishek Kumar, Shivnandan Kumar, Aayush Raj and Anurag Yadav were recovered from the shelf of the front seat and two mobile phones were recovered from the pocket of Sikandar Yadvendu. On interrogation regarding the question papers, he told that some of his students are appearing in the examination at the various centres whose setting were managed by Sanjeev Singh, Rocky and Nitesh and Amit Anand. They had taken some of the students to memorize the answers of the NEET question papers. After informing the same to his officials, when he reached DAV

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10279 of 2025(11) dt.04-07-2025 3/6

¶21

Public School, BSEB Colony and verified about Ayush Raj, he came to know that he is in Room No. 18. After the examination got over, on interrogation of Ayush Raj, he told the informant that he was taken to Learn Boys Hostel and Learn Play School, a night before the examination and was handed over the question papers and the answer sheets and was asked to memorize alongwith 20-25 other students. On searching the student, NEET Admit Card, test booklet, Aadhar Card, Pan Card, Passport Photo and Postcard were recovered from his possession. Thereafter, the informant prepared the seizure list and on the basis of his self statement, the present case has been instituted.

¶22

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case during the course of investigation. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not involved in the NEET Exam paper leak. The petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner as alleged and no any incriminating material has been found from his possession. Learned counsel has further submitted that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate. The co-accused person, Ayush Kumar

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10279 of 2025(11) dt.04-07-2025 4/6

¶24

@ Ayush Raj has already been granted regular bail by a Coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 24.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70959 of 2024. The other co-accused persons have already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 09.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 65810/2024. Learned counsel has further submitted that not a single receipt or paper has been filed on behalf of the prosecution showing that the petitioner is indulge in the said crime. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. No any question papers and the solved papers have been recovered from the possession of petitioner and the co-accused persons. The petitioner has four antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 10.07.2024.

¶25

5. Learned counsel for the C.B.I. as well as learned A.P.P. for the State have vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner has played active role in the alleged offence inasmuch as he is one of the coconspirators in the alleged offence, having direct link with the main conspirator. The regular bail application of the co-accused person has already been rejected by a Coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 27.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 80486/2024. A counter affidavit is being filed on behalf of the

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10279 of 2025(11) dt.04-07-2025 5/6

¶27

Opposite Party CBI, EO-III, New Delhi and submitted that the petitioner Rakesh Ranjan @ Rocky is one of the kingpins who in criminal conspiracy with other accused persons had managed to leak the question paper of the NEET exam-2024 from Oasis School, Hazaribagh. It is further revealed that the petitioner Rakesh Ranjan @ Rocky in criminal conspiracy with others including Baldev Kumar @ Chintu, Nitish and others managed the Learn Play School at Khemnichak where accused candidates had assembled and were given the copies of solved question paper of the NEET Exam-2024, the Investigation has revealed that Rakesh Ranjan @ Rocky has been instrumental in organising the affairs related to perpetration of crime at Patna. Further, the petitioner was arrested on 10.07.2024. Subsequently, on 05.10.2024, a charge-sheet was filed against accused Rakesh Ranjan@ Rocky (A-23) U/s. 120B r/w 109, 201, 380, 409, 411, 420 IPC and Section 13 (2) r/w 13 (1) (a) of PC Act, 1988 (as amended in year 2018) and under substantive offence of section 411 IPC. It is further submitted that the nature of the crime and the involvement of the petitioner do not justify to grant of bail.

¶28

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-

¶29

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10279 of 2025(11) dt.04-07-2025 6/6

¶30

named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, C.B.I-II., Patna in connection with RC No. 22122024E0006-CBI/EO-III/, New Delhi arising out of Shastri

¶31

Nagar P.S. Case No. 358 of 2024 with the conditions :-

¶32

(i) One of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner who shall give genealogy as to how he is related to the petitioner.

¶33

(ii) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

¶34

(iii) The petitioner shall not intimidate and/or influence the witnesses by inducement, fraud or promise.

¶35

(iv) The petitioner shall not leave the territory of India without permission of the Court and shall hand over the passport, if any to the C.B.I.

¶36

7. The application stands allowed.

¶37

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶38

atul/-

¶39

U T

Rakesh Ranjan @ Rocky v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Ranjan @ Rocky v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Goswami Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mahadev Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Sudip Kumar Vs The Union of India through the Direcot, C.B.I., New Delhi

Md. Imtiyaz Alam @ Imtiyaz Alam Vs The CBI through Asp- CBI Eo Iii, New Delhi

Tiyae Mahto @ Ranvijay Kumar @ Ranvijay Mahto Vs The State of Bihar