Bail appeal in a murder and SC/ST Act case. The court found no fresh ground to reconsider its earlier rejection, noted the trial court's report that three witnesses had been examined with the trial expected to conclude in nine months, and rejected bail while directing expedited conclusion of the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.715 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2023 Thana- KHUDWA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Umesh Chaudhary S/O Late Harihar Chaudhary Resident of Village - Malwan, P.S- Khudawan, Dist- Aurangabad
... ... Appellant/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Sagar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
4 09-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Perused the case diary.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.715 of 2025(4) dt.09-05-2025 2/3
appellant was rejected.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.715 of 2025(4) dt.09-05-2025 3/3
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Raj Kishore/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the appellant whose earlier bail application was rejected and where trial is expected to conclude in nine months.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Umesh Chaudhary
The State of Bihar
Jagjiwan Ram
Rudra Prakash Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
