Dismissed¶18

Pawan Poddar @ Pawan Kumar Poddar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2025CR. APP (SJ)/568/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of criminal appeal application; dismissed as withdrawn as not pressed; liberty to surrender before Court below within four weeks; regular bail application to be considered same day on own merit without prejudice from present order; Patna High Court; CR. APP (SJ) No.568 of 2024; PS Case No. 9/2012 Begusarai Complaint Case; Pawan Poddar; Santosh Poddar; Pramod Poddar; Lato Paswan; State of Bihar; Ranjeet Kumar Singh; Sadanand Paswan Spl.P.P.; Rajesh Kumar Verma J.; 01-07-2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the appellants to surrender before the learned Court below within four weeks and seek regular bail; the regular bail application to be considered on the same day on its own merit in accordance with law and without being prejudiced by any observation in the present order. ¶18

Pawan Poddar @ Pawan Kumar Poddar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the criminal appeal application, with liberty to surrender before the learned Court below within four weeks and seek regular bail.

¶16

Court's answer

Permission is accorded to the appellants to withdraw the application, with liberty to surrender before the learned Court below within four weeks and seek regular bail.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

The application is dismissed as withdrawn as not pressed.

¶18

Key takeaways

When the appellants surrender and seek regular bail before the learned Court below, the bail application shall be considered on the same day on its own merit in accordance with law and without being prejudiced by any observation in the present order.ratio¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 568 of 2024, High Court of Judicature at Patna (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J.), order dated 01-07-2025, arising out of PS Case No. 9 of 2012, Begusarai Complaint Case, District Begusarai. Appellants: Pawan Poddar @ Pawan Kumar Poddar, Santosh Poddar @ Santosh Kumar Poddar and Pramod Poddar; respondents: The State of Bihar and Lato Paswan. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants sought permission to withdraw the application with liberty to surrender before the learned Court below within four weeks and seek regular bail. Permission was accorded and the application was dismissed as withdrawn as not pressed, with liberty that when the appellants surrender and seek regular bail before the learned Court below, the same shall be considered on the same day on its own merit in accordance with law and without being prejudiced by any observation in the present order.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.568 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2012 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pawan Poddar @ Pawan Kumar Poddar S/O Late Arjun Poddar VillageShiv Nagar, P.O.- Masudanpur, Ps. Ballia, Dist. Begusarai.

¶5

Santosh Poddar @ Santosh Kumar Poddar S/O Late Arjun Poddar VillageShiv Nagar, P.O.- Masudanpur, Ps. Ballia, Dist. Begusarai.

¶6

Pramod Poddar S/O Late Devilal Poddar Village- Shiv Nagar, P.O.Masudanpur, Ps. Ballia, Dist. Begusarai.

¶7

... ... Appellant/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Lato Paswan S/O Late Bindeshwari Paswan Village- Shiv Nagar, P.OMasudanpur, Ps. Balia, Dist. Begusarai.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl.P.P. ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 01-07-2025

¶15

Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Sadanand Paswan, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to the appellants to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today and seeks regular bail.

¶17

Permission is accorded.

¶18

The application is dismissed as withdrawn as not

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.568 of 2024(5) dt.01-07-2025 2/2

¶20

pressed with the liberty that the appellants surrender and seek regular bail before the learned Court below, the same shall be considered on the same day on its own merit in accordance with law and without being prejudiced by any observation in the present order.

¶21

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶22

Jyoti Kumari/-

¶23

U T

Pawan Poddar @ Pawan Kumar Poddar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Poddar @ Pawan Kumar Poddar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guddu Rai @ Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nanhe Yadav @ Umesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Kush Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Madan Dubey @ Madan Mohan Prasad Dewedi Vs The State of Bihar

Monu Shahi @ Monu Kumar Shahi Vs the State of Bihar