Sonu Thakur @ Sone Lal Thakur @ Sono Lal Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.55 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2024 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia

======================================================

Sonu Thakur @ Sone Lal Thakur @ Sono Lal Thakur S/o Happu Thakur @ Yogendra Thakur R/o Village- Chandrahi Hajari Tol, P.S- Dhamdaha, DistrictPurnea

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Bablu Uraon @ Bablu Rishideo S/o Late Uttim Rishideo R/o vill - Chandrahi Hajari Tol, ward no. 7, P.S. - Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Vivekanand Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Ankita, Adv. For the State : Mr.Sadanand Paswan, Spl.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 10-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned

¶13

counsel for the respondent no. 2 and learned Spl. P.P. for the State.

¶14

2. This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the rejection of prayer for bail of the appellant vide order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 81 of 2024 dated 25.03.2024 registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 279, 304A of the Indian Penal Code later on Section 302 read with Section 34 of

¶15

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.55 of 2025(3) dt.10-04-2025 2/3

¶16

the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act were added.

¶17

3. As per prosecution case, one unknown vehicle dashed the informant’s brother, Budhu Uraon and he was taken to the hospital where during the course of treatment, he died.

¶18

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in the case during the course of investigation. There is no specific allegation against the appellant. During the course of investigation, the witnesses in their statements have attributed specific allegation is against the co-accused, Murli Yadav who fired on the informant’s brother as a result of which he died. It is further submitted that there is no allegation of abusing against the appellant and hence, no offence under provisions of SC/ST Act is made out against the appellant. It is further submitted that the appellant has no concern with the alleged offence. The appellant has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The appellant is in custody since 09.09.2024.

¶19

5. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State as

¶20

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.55 of 2025(3) dt.10-04-2025 3/3

¶21

well as learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 have opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.

¶22

6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as finding substance in the contenion of the learned counel for the appellant, the impugned order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 81 of 2024, is set aside against the appellant. The criminal appeal is allowed.

¶23

7. Accordingly, the above named appellant, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/(Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 81 of 2024 with the condition :-

¶24

(i) The appellant is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

¶25

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶26

Gautam/- U T

Sonu Thakur @ Sone Lal Thakur @ Sono Lal Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Thakur @ Sone Lal Thakur @ Sono Lal Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nil Kamal Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sintu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nirmal Ray Vs the State of Bihar