Allowed

Biranj Yadav @ Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Apr 2025CR. APP (SJ)/544/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail appeal, setting aside the Special Judge's order rejecting bail. Considering the simple nature of the injury and the custody period, the Court ordered the appellant's release on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 05-12-2024 rejecting bail was set aside; the appellant was released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Biranj Yadav @ Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Yadav Vs The State of… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.544 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-735 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Biranj Yadav @ Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Yadav S/O Ravindra yadav R/O Village- Digghi, P.S- Guraru, Distt.- Gaya.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Pradeep Kumar S/O Vasudev Das R/O Village- Balu Par, P.S- Muffasil, Distt.- Gaya.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP For the Informant : Mr. Ramakant Akela, Advocate ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 17-04-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶15

The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 05-12-2024 passed by Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with Muffasil PS Case No. 735 of 2024 instituted under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115, 117, 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act was rejected.

¶16

Prosecution case, in short, is that on 26.08.2024,

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.544 of 2025(3) dt.17-04-2025 2/3

¶18

the victim and his friend Sanoj Kumar were returning from a "Grah Prawesh" ceremony when 12-15 accused persons intercepted them near ‘Gauri Kanya High School’ and hurled caste-based abuses. The accused brutally assaulted the victim, fracturing his hand, and robbed him of his gold chain, purse, and documents. Appellants and other co-accused also fired gunshots, and the injured were later taken to Pilgrim Hospital.

¶19

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant is alleged of assaulting by means of iron rod, snatching gold chain and making aerial firing. But, so far as injury report is concerned, the same is found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the appellant has not taken the caste name of the informant in public view. Hence, no offence under the provisions of SC/ST Act is made out against him. The appellant has no intention to disgrace the image of the informant in public view. The appellant is in custody since 09-10-2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶20

Learned Special P.P. for the State and the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.544 of 2025(3) dt.17-04-2025 3/3

¶22

petitioner.

¶23

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, injury being found to be simple in nature and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and order dated 05-12-2024 passed by Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya is hereby set aside.

¶24

Let the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Muffasil PS Case No. 735 of 2024.

¶25

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Biranj Yadav @ Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Biranj Yadav @ Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Jalaluddin Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Sharma @ Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Choudhary @ Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar