Appellants sought anticipatory bail after the Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act rejected their application for offences alleged during an incident involving abusive conduct toward the informant's daughter. The appellate court found no ground to interfere and rejected the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.506 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2024 Thana- Raghunathpur District- East Champaran
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. Public Prosecutor ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 22-03-2025
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellants and Spl. Public Prosecutor.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.506 of 2025(2) dt.22-03-2025 2/2
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court should grant anticipatory bail to appellants accused under BNS and SC/ST (POA) Act provisions despite claims of false implication and omnibus allegations.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nawal Kishor Sahani
Sanjay Sahani @ Sanjay Kumar
The State of Bihar
Kanchani Devi
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
