Dismissed¶18

Nagendra Pandey and Anr. v. State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Sept 2025CR. APP (SJ)/505/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 505 of 2006; Nagendra Pandey v. State of Bihar; dismissal as infructuous; expiry of probation bond; probation bond Rs.2000 with two sureties; sections 324, 325, 323 IPC; Sessions Trial No. 186 of 2003; Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-Vth, Buxar; order dated 23.05.2006; probation ended 23.05.2008; Dr. Anshuman, J.; decided 23-09-2025; no substantive punishment revived.

What did the court decide?

None; appeal dismissed as infructuous and stands disposed of, with the observation that the appellants have no present responsibility towards the case. The learned APP for the State raised no objection. ¶18

Nagendra Pandey and Anr. Vs State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.505 of 2006

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Nagendra Pandey And Anr.

¶4

... ... Appellant/S

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Chandra Mohan Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 23-09-2025

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and Mrs.

¶10

Anita Kumari Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶11

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23.05.2006 passed in Sessions Trial No.186 of 2003 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-Vth, Buxar whereby and where under the appellant No.1 has been convicted under sections 324 and 325 of the IPC and appellant No.2 has been convicted under section 323 of the IPC, but appellants have been released on furnishing probation bonds of Rs.2000 with two sureties of like amount each to maintain peace and keep good behaviour for 2 years from the date of this order, failing which they will appear before the court for substantive punishment.

¶12

Counsel further submits that the said order has been

¶13

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.505 of 2006(3) dt.23-09-2025 2/2

¶14

passed on 23.05.2006 and the probation bond of 2 years has been ended on 23.05.2008 itself and the appeal could not be heard finally within the said period and now after about 20 years, this has been taken place.

¶15

In this background, counsel for the appellants submits that since the time of probation has already been ended in the year 2008 itself, therefore, he is not interested to pursue this appeal as it becomes infructuous.

¶16

Learned APP for the State has no objection for the

¶17

same.

¶18

Upon hearing the parties, it transpires to this Court that the present appeal has become infructuous. Therefore, the present appeal is hereby dismissed as infructuous. The present appellants have no responsibility at present due to lapse of time in future towards this case.

¶19

With the aforesaid observations, the present criminal appeal stands disposed of.

¶20

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶21

Prakashmani/-

¶22

Nagendra Pandey and Anr. v. State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagendra Pandey and Anr. v. State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhim Singh @ Bhimsen Singh and Anr. Vs State of Bihar

Ram Kumar Paswan Vs State of Bihar

Md. Gulzar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishnandan Pd.Mahto @ Krishna Mahto and Ors. Vs State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Sah Vs State of Bihar

Uday Mahton Vs State of Bihar