Aman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 19-06-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State. None appears for the informant.

¶14

The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 17-12-2024 passed by learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with Deokund PS Case No. 22 of 2024 instituted under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 110 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act was rejected. Earlier vide order dated 02-12-2024, passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 4421 of 2024, anticipatory bail of the appellant was

¶15

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.200 of 2025(5) dt.19-06-2025 2/3

¶16

withdrawn on account of his arrest.

¶17

Prosecution case, in short, is that on 25.07.2024 at about 3 PM, the informant was sitting outside her house when accused persons, including the appellant, came with sticks and started abusing and assaulting her. On hearing the noise, villagers gathered, causing the accused to flee. While leaving, they threatened to kill her and asked her to vacate the house.

¶18

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is admitted land dispute between the parties. There is delay of two days in lodging the FIR. There is no specific allegation against the appellant, rather allegation is general and omnibus in nature. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the appellant has not taken the caste name of the informant in public view. Hence, no offence under the provisions of SC/ST Act is made out against him. The appellant has no intention to disgrace the image of the informant in public view. The appellant is in custody since 30-10-2024 and has three criminal antecedents.

¶19

Learned Special P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.200 of 2025(5) dt.19-06-2025 3/3

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no specific allegation against the appellant and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and order dated 17-12-2024 passed by 1^st Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad is hereby set aside.

¶22

Let the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Deokund PS Case No. 22 of 2024.

¶23

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶24

Raj Kishore/- U T

Aman Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nandlal Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Tribhuwan patel Vs The State of Bihar

Nepali Chaudhary @ Sahdev Kumar @ Sahdeo Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar