Manish Yadav @ Manish Kumar yadav Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1380 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2024 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani

======================================================

Manish Yadav @ Manish Kumar yadav S/o- Suman Yadav @ Soman Yadav @ Sobhan Yadav Village- Sukki Ps- Khajauli Dist- Madhubani

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Jibachh Saday S/o- Late Chhotkan Saday Village- Sukki Ps- Khajauli DistMadhubani

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

6 03-11-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State. Notice issued is validly served despite which no one turned on the informant’s behalf. Perused the case diary.

¶15

The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 28.02.2025 passed by 1^st Additional Judge-cum-Special Judge SC/ST Act, Madhubani, whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 110 of 2024 instituted under Sections 302, 201 & 34 of the IPC and Sections 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act was rejected.

¶16

Prosecution case, in short, is that on 30-05-2024, father of the informant slept outside the house and, in the morning, he was found dead, hanging on a rod of pillar. As per

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1380 of 2025(6) dt.03-11-2025 2/3

¶18

F.I.R., the co-accused persons including the appellant are involved in the alleged occurrence.

¶19

4 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that there is delay of one day in lodging the F.I.R. that too without there being any plausible explanation for the same which creates doubt in the veracity of the prosecution case. It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence. Postmortem report reveals cause of death is asphyxia due to hanging. It is submitted that father of the informant has committed suicide due to family dispute as is evident from the postmortem report. There is no eye-witness to the alleged occurrence. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case under Sections 341, 323, 306, 498, 504, 506 & 34 of the I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v)(va) of the SC/ST Act. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the appellant has not taken the caste name of the informant in public view. Hence, no offence under the provisions of SC/ST Act is made out against him. The appellant has no intention to disgrace the image of the informant in public view. The appellant is in custody since 07.02.2024 and has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the co-

¶20

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1380 of 2025(6) dt.03-11-2025 3/3

¶21

accused Ramdeo Yadav has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 05.12.2024 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 3722 of 2024.

¶22

Learned Special P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellant. It is submitted that allegation against the appellant is serious in nature.

¶23

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no cogent material against the appellant even in the case diary and the period of custody undergone by the appellant, this Court is inclined to allow this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and order dated 28.02.2025 (G.R. No. 72 of 2024) passed by 1^st Additional Judge-cumSpecial Judge SC/ST Act, Madhubani is hereby set aside.

¶24

Let the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 110 of 2024.

¶25

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶26

rishi/-

¶27

U T

Manish Yadav @ Manish Kumar yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Yadav @ Manish Kumar yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shambhu Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chintu Kumar @ Chandra Shen Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Salman Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Babudin @ Babuddin Ali @ Babudin Ali Vs The State of Bihar