Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

The State of Bihar Vs Shatrudhan Prasad Saw — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Patna HC
2025
The State of Bihar Vs Shatrudhan Prasad SawThe State of Bihar v. Shatrudhan Prasad Saw

Dismissed¶16

The State of Bihar v. Shatrudhan Prasad Saw

Patna HC5 Feb 2025L.P.A/217/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court | Letters Patent Appeal No.217 of 2020 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8809 of 2019 | dismissed for noncompliance of office objections | office objections | previous order dated 15.01.2025 | State of Bihar Department of Education | District Education Officer Gaya | Shatrudhan Prasad Saw | Assistant Teacher (English) Project Girls School Barachatti Gaya | oral order Justice P. B. Bajanthri | Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra | decision 05-02-2025 | procedural dismissal | no substantive holding.

What did the court decide?

In the light of the previous order dated 15.01.2025, the present L.P.A. No.217 of 2020 stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. ¶16

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Ratio / Principle

In the light of the previous order dated 15.01.2025, the present L.P.A. No.217 of 2020 stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bare procedural disposal: Letters Patent Appeal No.217 of 2020, arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8809 of 2019 (State of Bihar, Department of Education and its officers as appellants, versus Shatrudhan Prasad Saw, Assistant Teacher (English), respondent), was dismissed by the Patna High Court on 05-02-2025 by oral order per Honourable Justice P. B. Bajanthri (bench included Honourable Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra) for non-compliance of office objections, in the light of the Court's previous order dated 15.01.2025. The judgment contains no substantive adjudication; no statute or precedent is engaged.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.217 of 2020 In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8809 of 2019

======================================================

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Education, New Secretariat Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

The Principal Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna..

The Director (Secondary Education) Department of Education, Bihar Secondary Education Office, Budh Marg, Patna.

The District Education Officer Gaya.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

Shatrudhan Prasad Saw Son of Late Basudeo Saw R/o Village-Maghurapur, Police Station-Duraru, District-Gaya, Presently Posted aws Assistant Teacher (English) in Project Girls School, Barachatti, Gaya

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr .Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, AC to AAG-15. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

4 05-02-2025 In the light of previous order dated 15.01.2025, the present L.P.A. No.217 of 2020 stands dismissed for noncompliance of office objections.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

( Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

ritik/-

U

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
The appeal arises out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8809 of 2019; the decision in that case (the subject matter challenged by this appeal) is not described in this judgment text.¶2
Prior proceeding
A previous order of this Court dated 15.01.2025 preceded this disposal; its contents are not set out in the text.¶16

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Education¶4
Shashi Shekhar Tiwary
appellant
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar¶5
Shashi Shekhar Tiwary
appellant
The Director (Secondary Education), Department of Education¶6
Shashi Shekhar Tiwary
appellant
The District Education Officer, Gaya¶7
Shashi Shekhar Tiwary
respondent
Shatrudhan Prasad Saw¶10

Coram

AI extract

P. B. Bajanthriauthor¶15
Sunil Dutta Mishramember¶14

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Patna HC
Decided on: 5 Feb 2025 · February
Registered: 2 Mar 2020
Case no.: L.P.A/217/2020
CNR: BRHC010245932020
Bench: P. B. Bajanthri Sunil Dutta Mishra
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: Letters Patent Appeal

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from P. B. Bajanthri Sunil Dutta Mishra

G. M. Kumar Vs Kiran Kumari
4 Feb 2025
Savitri Devi Vs Dulhin Anandi Devi
4 Feb 2025
Nutan Kumari Vs The State of Bihar
4 Feb 2025
Khushboo Kumari Vs The State of Bihar
5 Feb 2025
Chandra Shekhar Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1
5 Feb 2025
Niranjan Kumar Vs Amrita Kumari
5 Feb 2025

Cite this judgement

The State of Bihar v. Shatrudhan Prasad Saw, L.P.A/217/2020 (PAT), decided on 5 February 2025.

The Patna High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history2

The appeal arises out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8809 of 2019; the decision in that case (the subject matter challenged by this appeal) is not described in this judgment text.
A previous order of this Court dated 15.01.2025 preceded this disposal; its contents are not set out in the text.

View full history

Bench / Coram

P. B. Bajanthri and Sunil Dutta Mishra

Parties & counsel