In this intra-court appeal, the Patna High Court dismissed the appeal via an oral order, granting the appellant permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a fresh petition following the Single Judge's rejection based on res judicata principles.
Permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.100 of 2022 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3420 of 2021
======================================================
Manju Kumari, aged about 42 years (female), Wife of Anil Pandit, Resident of Sarahi Mor, Naya Bazar, Ward No.3, Nagar Parishad, District- Saharsa.
... ... Appellant/s
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Mukund, Advocate Mr. Purnendu Keshav, aD,, Mr. Satya Narayan Mahto, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma ( AAG 3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)
8 09-09-2025
The present intra-court appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 29.01.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 3420 of 2021.
“4. Without impleading such of those persons, whose rights are likely to be affected in the final panel/list dated 28.03.2020, the present petition has been presented in seeking appointment of Grade-IV employee in
Patna High Court L.P.A No.100 of 2022(8) dt.09-09-2025 2/2
Saharsa district.
5. Therefore, the present petition stands dismissed in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Ranjan Kumar & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. reported in (2014) 16 SCC 187 (Para 3 to 13) reserving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition.
the liberty aforesaid.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Sujit/-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant can seek appointment on being denied notice to interested parties in the final panel selection process.
Whether the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed against the Single Judge’s dismissal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ranjan Kumar & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.Referred¶19
(2014) 16 SCC 187 · Who else cites this
Manju Kumari
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
