Dismissed¶17

Dulhin Ramswari@Ramskhi Devi and v. Santosh Kr.Chaudhari and Ors.

Patna HC23 Jan 2024SA/169/1987

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dulhin Ramswari @ Ramskhi Devi & Anr. v. Santosh Kr.Chaudhari And Ors - SA No.169 of 1987, High Court of Judicature at Patna, coram Dr. Anshuman, J., decided 23-01-2024. Dismissal for default (non-appearance of parties/appellants) under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC 1908, with readmission liberty under Order XLI Rule 19 CPC 1908. No precedent cases engaged; no monetary quantum involved; no advocates named in the appearance block.

What did the court decide?

Second appeal dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17, CPC 1908; liberty granted to appellants/heirs/legal representatives to seek readmission under Order XLI Rule 19; Office directed to return the L.C. record to the court concerned. ¶17

Dulhin Ramswari@Ramskhi Devi and Vs Santosh Kr.Chaudhari and Ors. — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SECOND APPEAL No.169 of 1987

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dulhin Ramswari @ Ramskhi Devi & Anr.

¶4

... ... Appellant/S

¶5

Versus

¶6

Santosh Kr.Chaudhari And Ors

¶7

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : None. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶8

23 23-01-2024

¶9

No one appears either on behalf of the appellants or

¶10

on behalf of the respondents.

¶11

Vide order No. 22, dated 09.01.2024, following order has been passed which is stated below:-

¶12

“From the record, it transpires that vide order No. 19 dated 05.02.2020, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants and again vide order No.20, dated 05.07.2022, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants, but vide order No.21 dated 28.11.2023, both the counsels appeared and prayed for time and on their request, this appeal has been adjourned and fixed in the 1^st week of January, 2024. Today, upon repeated call, no one appeared either on behalf of the appellants or respondents.

¶13

In the interest of justice and being a last chance, this appeal is adjourned for one week i.e., on 23.01.2024.

¶14

Patna High Court SA No.169 of 1987(23) dt.23-01-2024 2/2

¶15

If on the said date fixed no one appears on behalf of the parties, appropriate order shall be passed.”

¶16

Since none appears on behalf of the appellants even after repeated call. In this background, it transpires to this Court that the appellants are not interested to pursue this appeal and therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this appeal.

¶17

As such, this second appeal is dismissed due to appellants default in the light of Order XLI Rule 17 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

¶18

Liberty is hereby granted that the appellants or their heirs or legal representatives may file an application for readmission of appeal which has been dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 19 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

¶19

Office is directed to return the L.C. record to the court concerned.

¶20

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶21

Prakashmani/-

¶22

Dulhin Ramswari@Ramskhi Devi and v. Santosh Kr.Chaudhari and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dulhin Ramswari@Ramskhi Devi and v. Santosh Kr.Chaudhari and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Rekha Kumari @ Pawan Rekha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Janaki Devi and Ors. Vs Manakia and Ors.

Sheoji Rai Vs Kanhiaya Rai and Ors.

Dipika Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Saudagar Tanti Vs Durga Prasad Sao

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.