An oral order by the Patna High Court dismissing the civil review petition in Civil Review No. 28 of 2022, which was the petitioner's appeal against an earlier order. The petition stands dismissed in terms of the previous order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.28 of 2022 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.161 of 2020 ====================================================== Abdul Sattar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar, ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Diwakar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag 12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 4 13-03-2024 In terms of previous order, petition stands dismissed. (P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
vashudha/-
U
Abdul Sattar
The State of Bihar
P. B. Bajanthri
Alok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
