Contempt petition disposed of after petitioner's counsel failed to comply with an earlier direction; liberty reserved to challenge the impugned action afresh in accordance with law.
Liberty reserved to the petitioner to assail the impugned action in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.913 of 2023 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19927 of 2021
======================================================
Awadh Kamat S/o Tanuk Lal Kamat, resident of village, P.O. and P.S. - Ghoghardita and the District – Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandeshwar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap (Gp2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
order:-
“One week time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply the order dated 28.10.2024. If the same is not complied, MJC would be disposed of.”
Patna High Court MJC No.913 of 2023(9) dt.26-11-2024 2/2
impugned action if it is so advised and in accordance with law.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
Ankit Kumar/-
U
Awadh Kamat
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Madhubani
The Nodal Officer Cum the B.D.O. Ghoghardiha Block
P. B. Bajanthri
S. B. Pd. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
