The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition did not survive for consideration due to later developments. The court observed the matter had become infructuous and disposed of the Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5252 of 2018
In
Letters Patent Appeal No.311 of 2017
======================================================
Raj Kumar Son of Bindeshwari Prasad Resident of Mohalla- Bal Govind Bigha Dehri, P.S.- Dehri, District - Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh - AAG 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
======================================================
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
submitted that the present petition do not survive for consideration in view of the later development.
and it has become infractuous.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
amitkumar/-
U
Raj Kumar
The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Tripurari Sharan
Sri Pankaj Dikshit
Mr. S. Kumara Sammy
P. B. Bajanthri
Alok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
