Miscellaneous jurisdiction case arising from a civil writ petition, dismissed for non-compliance with office objections despite an earlier order dated 28.02.2024 directing compliance.
None; petition dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.333 of 2022
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11668 of 2021
======================================================
Ranjit Kumar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi (AAG 10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
4 13-03-2024 In the light of earlier order dated 28.02.2024 for non-compliance of office objections, the present MJC petition stands dismissed.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
amitkumar/-
U
Ranjit Kumar
The State of Bihar
P. B. Bajanthri
Alok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
