In a miscellaneous jurisdiction case arising from a writ petition, the court considered a Registrar Vigilance enquiry report dated 19.11.2024, which found no impersonation in filing the petition on behalf of the petitioner as alleged, and dismissed the MJC for want of maintainability.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.292 of 2011 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10507 of 2009
======================================================
MD MUSTAFA
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sunil Kr. Mandal Sc24 Ms.Neelam Kumari, AC to SC3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
6 20-11-2024
None appears for the petitioner.
enquiry and submitted a report dated 19.11.2024 and the same has been placed in the file. We have perused the report dated 19.11.2024, we find that there is no impersonation in filing petition on behalf of the petitioner – Md. Mustafa as alleged. Accordingly, the present MJC is not maintainable. Hence, modification of MJC No. 292 of 2011 stands dismissed.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
abhishekkr/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an impersonation was committed in filing the petition on behalf of the petitioner, rendering the MJC maintainable?
Md Mustafa
The State of Bihar
P. B. Bajanthri
S. B. Pd. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
