Allowed

Singasan Yadav v. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms

Patna HC23 Aug 2024MJC/2755/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought restoration of C.W.J.C. No. 9365 of 2024, dismissed for want of prosecution after counsel could not appear. The court restored the writ petition to its original file and allowed the miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of C.W.J.C. No. 9365 of 2024 to the original file; petition allowed.

Singasan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar through the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2755 of 2024

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9365 of 2024

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Singasan Yadav Son of Late Ramanand Yadav Resident of Manjhaua, P.O.Arah, P.S. - Arah Town, District- Bhojpur.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Collector, Bhojpur at Ara.

¶11

The Circle Officer, Bhojpur, Ara.

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sushant Praveer, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Government Advocate 9

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 23-08-2024

¶19

The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 9365 of 2024, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 25.07.2024.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the counsel for the petitioner was engaged in another Court, he could not appear when the case was called out for hearing, hence, the aforesaid writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, thus a

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.2755 of 2024(2) dt.23-08-2024 2/2

¶22

sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file.

¶23

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also taking into account the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 9365 2024 to its original file.

¶24

The present petition stands allowed.

¶25

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶26

S.Sb/-

¶27

Singasan Yadav v. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Singasan Yadav v. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harsh Kumar Agrawal Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhu Nath Prasad Vs Kamlesh Prasad Yadav and Ors.

Raj Kumari Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Lalan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Kumar Yadav @ Suresh Singh Vs The State of Bihar.

Bipin Kumar Agarwal Vs The State of Bihar