Allowed

Smt. Anjali Thakur, v. Dr. Piyush Anand

Patna HC8 Aug 2024MJC/249/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wife sought transfer of her divorce case from Saharsa to Purnia, citing residence with aged parents and lack of financial support. The opposite party did not object and wanted early disposal. The court allowed the transfer petition and directed the transferred court to expedite the 2018 case.

What did the court decide?

Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 09/2018 transferred from Family Court, Saharsa to Family Court, Purnea; transferred court directed to expedite disposal.

Smt. Anjali Thakur, Vs Dr. Piyush Anand — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.249 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Smt. Anjali Thakur, W/o Dr. Piyush Anand, D/o Dr. Parmanand Thakur, R/o Mohalla-Jay Prakash Nagar, Maithili Tola, Purnea, P.S. and District-Purnea.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Dr. Piyush Anand, S/o Praween Kumar Jha, R/o Mohalla-Haliya Gachchi, Saharsa, Ward No. 32 Under Nagar Parishad, Saharsa, P.S. and DistrictSaharsa.

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 08-08-2024 Heard the parties.

¶11

“This application has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner, deserted wife, for transfer of Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 09/2018 pending in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharsa to the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea.”

¶12

The Opposite Party No. 2 has appeared and he

¶13

submits that for the peace of his mind, he just want the conclusion of Matrimonial (Divorce Case No. 09 of 2018) as despite their marriage which took place in 2013, they could not pursue their life together and for long are living their separate lives.

¶14

The case of the petitioner is that, she is in Purnia with her old parents having no financial support and not

¶15

Patna High Court MJC No.249 of 2020(3) dt.08-08-2024 2/2

¶16

possible in that background for her to move from Purnia to Saharsa on each and every date.

¶17

In view of the fair submission made by the Opposite Party, who simply wants disposal of Matrimonial (Divorce Case No. 09 of 2018) which according to him is not moving further due to the pendency of the present petition, this Court deems it fit and proper that the Matrimonal (Divorce Case No. 09 0f 2018) be shifted from the court of learned Principal Judge Family Court, Saharsa to the court of learned Principal Judge Family Court, Purnia, forthwith.

¶18

The present petition (MJC No. 249 of 2020) is allowed. Let the files of Matrimonal (Divorce Case No. 09 0f 2018) transferred from the court of learned Principal Judge Family Court, Saharsa to the court of learned Principal Judge Family Court, Purnia, forthwith.

¶19

In view of the fact that, the case is of the year 2018 the transferred court shall expedite the matter and conclude it as early as possible.

¶20

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶21

vinayak/-

¶22

Smt. Anjali Thakur, v. Dr. Piyush Anand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Anjali Thakur, v. Dr. Piyush Anand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Nishant Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Chand Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. And Others

Dr. Meena Prasad Vs The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary

Nishi Chanda Vs Shashi Bhushan Sinha