Petitioner challenged an alleged contempt order. Court found the impugned order had been complied with and dismissed the application as infructuous.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1234 of 2023
In
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1124 of 2022
======================================================
Yashwant Kumar Singh @ Yashwant Kumar son of Late Ram Kumar Singh, at present residing at 12 Akshay Nilay First Cross, GKM College Road, Jarganahall, J.P. Nagar, 6 Phase, Bengaluru (Karnataka), Permanent resident of Village Gurua, P.S. Gurua, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeeb Kumar Sanju, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj (GP-5)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of which contempt has been alleged stands complied with.
2. Mr. Nadim Seraj, learned GP-5 for the State is present.
3. This application is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
SUSHMA2/- U
Yashwant Kumar Singh @ Yashwant Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
