Petitioner sought further time to comply with an earlier court order regarding filing a jointness affidavit due to protraction. The court recorded that the affidavit was not filed and dismissed the petition for non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.969 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
8 30-01-2024 On 21.12.2023, the following order was passed:-
“No jointness affidavit has been filed in terms of order dated 23.11.2023 of this Court.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.969 of 2017(8) dt.30-01-2024
2/2
time for compliance of the order dated 23.11.2023.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
DKS/-
U
1. Shahid Hassain S/o Late Sayed Mustafa 2. Bibi Mahmuna, Wife of Late Sayed Mohammad 3. Ansari Begum 4. Israt Begum 5. Raushan Begum 6. Najni Begum
1. Faima Khatoon daughter of Sayed Zafar Hussain 2. Md. Nausad Khan 3.1. Sayed Raja Hussain 3.2. Sayed Shahnawaz Hussain 3.3. Bilkis Khatoon 3.4. Soni Khatoon 4
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
