Civil miscellaneous petition from 2017; petitioners repeatedly sought adjournments and failed to appear on the listing date, so the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.958 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
6 06-05-2024 On call, none appears for the petitioners.
“Mr. Hari Mohan Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks short adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty of the regular counsel.
2. Perusal of record shows on the previous three occasions, time has been sought on behalf of the petitioners on one pretext or another.
3. However, by way of last opportunity, list this case on 01.05.2024.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.958 of 2017(6) dt.06-05-2024 2/2
this case.
for non-prosecution.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Ashish/-
U
Smt. Nanda Devi
Smt. Shova Shrivastava
Arvind Kumar Srivastava
Pankaj Kumar
Ajay Kumar
Ajit Kumar Srivastava
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
